• Facebook
  • Google Plus
  • RSS Feed
  • Twitter

Menu

Skip to content
  • About
  • Staff
  • Contact
  • Support
  • Advertise
  • FAQ
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
Header image

Times of San DiegoLogo

Local News and Opinion for San Diego

Menu

Skip to content
  • All
  • Politics
  • Crime
  • Business
  • Sports
  • Education
  • Arts
  • Military
  • Tech
  • Life
  • Opinion
Search Thousands of San Diego Jobs
  • 2,000 Browse Bizarre Bazaar: 'All Things Weird' Expo Kicks Off Tour in Del Mar
  • 2 San Diego Small Businesses Share in $750 Million Cluster of Navy Contracts
  • Police Seek Elderly Man Who Went Missing in Little Italy
  • San Diego State Can't Make Up for Mitchell's Loss, Dropping 2nd Straight to Utah State
  • Motorcyclist Killed on Northbound I-5 Near Las Pulgas Canyon Road

Home » Politics » This Article

Controversial Bill Requiring Higher Housing Density Near Transit Moving Forward

Posted by Editor on April 28, 2019 in Politics | 496 Views
| Comments | Leave a Comment
Share This Article:
Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail
Duetta neighborhood of Millenia
New apartments in the Duetta neighborhood of Millenia in Chula Vista. Courtesy Chelsea Investment Corporation,

By Matt Levin | CALmatters

A controversial bill that would force California cities to allow denser housing around public transit cleared a major hurdle last week, but only after its sponsor agreed to go easier on smaller-sized counties.

Support Times of San Diego's growth
with a small monthly contribution

Become a supporter

Senate Bill 50, from Democratic Sen. Scott Wiener of San Francisco, passed out of a key legislative committee after it was amended to take a softer approach to counties of less than 600,000 people.

While the bill still faces fierce political opposition and a long road ahead in the state Legislature, the vote marks a significant victory for Wiener’s move to promote more dense housing around transit—an approach he says is necessary to help alleviate the state’s housing shortage and curb greenhouse gas emissions from commuters.

Originally, the bill would have required all California neighborhoods within a half-mile of a major public transit stop to allow apartment buildings four to five stories tall. No longer would cities be able to restrict zoning around transit to exclusively single-family homes, for example.

CALmatters logo“We know what we need to do,” Wiener said at Wednesday’s hearing, in a Capitol hearing room overflowing with advocates on both sides of the issue. “You can have all the funding for affordable housing in the world and all the streamlining in the world, but if you don’t have zoning changes, it’s all for naught.”

The original provision would still apply to the 15 most populous California  counties, including Los Angeles, San Francisco and San Diego counties. “Jobs-rich” communities not within a half-mile of public transportation would also have to change local zoning laws to allow for taller buildings.

But under the new compromise, smaller counties—including those with expensive real estate markets such as Marin, Santa Barbara and San Luis Obispo—would be treated differently.

Most cities in those smaller counties would be forced to allow housing near public transit that’s slightly more dense than what’s currently allowed, but not 4-5 stories. They also would also be required to approve duplexes, triplexes and four-plexes “by right” in almost all neighborhoods, allowing developers to bypass the often lengthy and costly process of getting small housing projects approved by local planning commissions and city councils.

The new provisions for smaller counties incorporate elements of what was a rival plan from Sen. Mike McGuire, Democrat from Healdsburg, who chairs the Senate Governance and Finance committee that held Wednesday’s vote.

“A blanket one-size-fits-all approach simply does not work for every community here in California,” said McGuire, whose district includes famously anti-development Marin County.

Advocates for Wiener’s bill point out that even the weaker density requirements on smaller counties could lead to a substantial boost to new housing—and that the “four-plex” provision in particular means an end to neighborhoods zoned exclusively for single-family homes. The city of Minneapolis made national headlines for a similar law last year.

Wednesday’s vote is a noteworthy victory for Wiener, whose try at similar legislation last year failed to advance this far.

Several politically influential groups that opposed last year’s legislation are now on board, or at least aren’t explicitly opposed. Construction labor unions have thrown their weight behind the bill, while several housing equity groups concerned about the bill’s potential to gentrify lower-income neighborhoods are still negotiating with Wiener.

But California cities up and down the state still view SB 50 as an unprecedented encroachment on local control over housing decisions. While the most fierce opposition has come from smaller municipalities, the Los Angeles City Counciland San Francisco Board of Supervisors have  adopted resolutions opposing the bill.

“It’s not one-size-fits-all, its two-sizes-fits-all,” said David Reyes, a Pasadena city planner testifying against the bill even as amended. He warned that the state can expect cities to sue to block Wiener’s bill if it becomes law.

Some tenant rights and anti-gentrification groups, including those affiliated with the Los Angeles-based AIDS Healthcare Foundation, testified against the bill Wednesday. A controversial flyer from the AIDS Healthcare Foundation sent to San Francisco households compared SB 50 to the “urban renewal” programs of the mid-20th century, invoking the image of African-American author James Baldwin, who called such programs “Negro removal.”

“Frankly, we have too many deep concerns about SB 50’s impacts, even with the amendments on low-income communities of color, to support it,” testified Shanti Singh of Tenants Together.

Sen. Jim Beall, a Democrat from San Jose who opposed Wiener’s legislation last year, said his support for the bill this year was conditioned on passage of a broader housing package, which would include new funding sources for low-income housing and more tenant protections.

“If there’s not a package we’ll continue to have  conflicts,” said Beall.

Even if the bill were to pass the Legislature, it’s unclear whether Gov. Gavin Newsom would sign it. Newsom has floated several proposals aimed at reaching his goal of 3.5 million new California homes by 2025, but has balked at publicly supporting SB 50.

CALmatters is a nonprofit, nonpartisan media venture explaining California policies and politics.

Controversial Bill Requiring Higher Housing Density Near Transit Moving Forward was last modified: April 29th, 2019 by Editor

>> Subscribe to Times of San Diego’s free daily email newsletter! Click here

Follow Us:
Facebooktwitterrss
Posted in Politics | Tagged California, CALmatters, development, gentrification, housing, legislature, real estate, Scott Wiener, tranist
Search Thousands of San Diego Jobs

Get Times of San Diego by Email

Our free newsletter is delivered at 8 a.m. daily.


Most Popular Today

  • New CDC Data Shows How San Diego County Ranks Nationally in the Pandemic New CDC Data Shows How San Diego County Ranks Nationally in the Pandemic 1,610 views
  • Opinion: Santee's Dustin Trotter Should Resign as Backer of D.C. Insurrectionists Opinion: Santee’s Dustin Trotter Should Resign as Backer of D.C. Insurrectionists 920 views
  • MarketInk: Prolific Announcer Hangs Up Microphone After 2,000 Games Over 35 Years MarketInk: Prolific Announcer Hangs Up Microphone After 2,000 Games Over 35 Years 860 views
  • San Diego Residents 65+ Are Next in Line for Vaccine, But Supplies Still Limited San Diego Residents 65+ Are Next in Line for Vaccine, But Supplies Still Limited 560 views
  • Nazi Flag Driver, an Iraq Combat Veteran, Has Gun Violence Restraining Order Nazi Flag Driver, an Iraq Combat Veteran, Has Gun Violence Restraining Order 490 views

©®2021 Times of San Diego LLC

Menu

  • About
  • Staff
  • Contact
  • Support
  • Advertise
  • FAQ
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service