Jeremi Roesler takes over as Julian fire chief Monday, succeeding five-year Chief Rick Marinelli and inheriting a firestorm.
A battalion chief with Cal Fire’s Battalion 5, Roesler will be dealing with lawsuits, complaints of Brown Act violations, expected protests at the Julian fire station on state Route 79 and an angry citizenry that has petitioned twice to keep its last-in-the-county volunteer force.
Plus an Indian claim to fire station land.
In April, the Julian-Cuyamaca Fire Protection District board voted to begin the process of dissolution — turning its property and staff over to the San Diego County Fire Authority and Cal Fire’s San Diego Unit. Both are led by Chief Tony Mecham.
That could take months, involving the San Diego Local Agency Formation Commission, or LAFCO, and possible public votes in the apple-pie mecca one local calls the “Mayberry of San Diego County.”
But Jeremiah “Jeremi” Roesler, a 51-year-old Temecula resident, will be on the hot seat immediately as he leads a 54-member volunteer force fearful of what some are calling a “hostile takeover.”
“I’m getting all kinds of questions from the guys, saying: ‘Well, Chief, what do we do? Because the fire chief’s not answering those questions,’” said veteran Julian fire Battalion Chief Mike Van Bibber, referring to Marinelli staying mum.
“My boss … is very adamant that we [volunteers] need to go away,” he said of Marinelli. “He has ceased to communicate with all of his officers for the last several months.”
According to the separation agreement he signed March 20, part-time Chief Marinelli is retiring with a severance package that includes $26,400. It required him to “use his best efforts to recruit” a new chief.
Marinelli didn’t respond to requests for comment, and Roesler — whose hiring as chief wasn’t confirmed by a county spokeswoman until Tuesday — also was unavailable for questions.
Brian Kramer, a Julian board member who opposes dissolution, said Wednesday that he was never officially informed of Roesler’s hiring and that Marinelli should lose* his severance for not complying with its terms to find a new chief.
Board President Jack Shelver, a main driver for dissolution, said Wednesday in a phone interview that Roesler didn’t need to undergo board review because Cal Fire was responsible for providing management. (But the board can fire him, if need be.)
Roesler will work Mondays, Tuesdays and Wednesdays, so his first day on the job isn’t until June 4, said Shelver — who also indicated he wouldn’t run for re-election to the board, given the stress of recent months. (And contrary to rumors, he’s not moving to Twentynine Palms, where he owns a house. He said he would rent lodging in Julian.)
Wednesday evening, county spokeswoman Alex Bell said the board “has appointed” Roesler to the position of interim fire chief.
“Jeremi has had a wide variety of experience to prepare for this new position and is looking forward to the challenges and opportunities it will bring,” she said in a provided statement. “With over 20 years of experience, Jeremi has worked in the Madera-Mariposa-Merced, Riverside and San Diego Units in both state-funded Schedule B and Cooperative Agreement funded Schedule A positions, including experience as a volunteer firefighter.”
Before accepting a field operations assignment in San Diego County Fire’s Battalion 5, Roesler was chief officer in the Monte Vista Interagency Command Center and previously worked as an ECC captain, “and in fire stations ranging from traditional 4-person staffing to 1-person staffing, often working side by side with Paid Call Firefighters or Volunteer Firefighters.”
The statement concluded: “Having [been] promoted to company officer in 2001 and battalion chief in 2015, Jeremi has considerable experience overseeing large operations, lending his expertise to the US&R FIRESCOPE working group and the Madera-Mariposa-Merced Instructor Cadre for Rescue where he played a major role in the implementation of the Technical Rescue Program.
“Currently he serves on Cal Fire Incident Command Team 3 in the role of operations branch director and is working on completing his Chief Officer Certification.”
Last week, before leaving the country for six days, Chief Mecham told Times of San Diego that a Cal Fire unit would “sit side-by-side with the fire engine staffed by the volunteers along with the ambulance and the county reserves, and we’ll basically all respond to calls together.”
The elected five-member board will stay, he said, and “they still keep their authorities.” That’s spelled out in a board-approved interim service agreement.
Mecham acknowledged that Julian residents are “very vocal” — including those who in eight days gathered 329 petition signatures urging the fire board to resist county efforts to absorb their 34-year-old, 4,000-resident district.
(The county has no fire department. It contracts with Cal Fire for unincorporated area protection.)
“I respond daily to items and issues that are just completely false and without any factual basis,” Mecham said in a phone interview. “So I just reached a point where we’re just going to respond through counsel and make sure that we present a very clear picture of the facts.”
Facts are in dispute, however.
Mecham testified May 15 before the county Board of Supervisors that the Julian fire board had twice turned thumbs down on dissolution. Julian critics say it was three or four times.
Mecham told the board that Cal Fire, on average, responds to nearly 600 calls a year in Julian, and out of those, “597 times we’re getting there well within our established response times.”
Critics scoff — and insist that Cal Fire’s response time is worse than Julian’s (sometimes on account of lack of familiarity with area geography). They swap horror stories of Cal Fire crews getting lost.
Other key documents:
- Notice of Julian proposal to San Diego LAFCO (PDF)
- Craig Sherman May 4 letter to San Diego LAFCO (PDF)
- Sherman declaration on behalf of Julian firefighters (PDF)
- Sherman May 14 request for temporary stay order (PDF)
County officials contend that Julian’s finances are in dire straits — a district limping along on a $50-a-year fire fee passed in 1984 plus, until January, a $60,000 county subsidy.
“There’s no crisis here,” former Julian fire volunteer Bill Everett told county supervisors. “There’s no staffing crisis. There’s no financial crisis.” (Julian voters in November will get a chance to raise their fire fee to $200 a year.)
Spokeswoman Bell said via email that the service agreement would boost “the current level of fire and EMS service to Julian residents and visitors by adding full-time professional firefighters and a paramedic fire engine to the community.”
Van Bibber suggests that a “secret” plan hatched by LAFCO and the county said that once all 20 rural fire agencies came under the county umbrella, “they could start asking for taxes and fees.”
“Once we go down, if we go down, it is going to affect every property owner in the unincorporated area of the county,” he said. “Every one of them.”
(On Wednesday, Bell responded: “There are no plans for the Fire Authority to ask for taxes and/or fees from residents who receive fire and emergency medical service coverage through the Fire Authority.”)
But most galling to the battalion chief and others was a form that Chief Marinelli submitted to LAFCO that said the Julian station is staffed by “O daily” volunteer firefighters.
“I have seven people on duty at the firehouse right now,” Van Bibber said Friday. “I have a duty chief assigned today as a supervisor. … We actually have a duty roster where people are assigned days to work. Just like any other fire department.”
He called Marinelli’s zero-staffing claim “a complete falsification.”
On Wednesday, the county’s Bell said Marinelli wrote Mecham May 23 to correct the record, saying: “On the LAFCO dissolution application some of the personnel here have noticed that on page 4 the table shows zero in all the categories for the JCFPD staffing. The first two lines are correct as it relates to paid personnel but the third line shows 0 non-paid reserves when in fact it should show 1-6.”
Van Bibber, 52, disputes the image of volunteer firefighters as local yokels who,jump into their pickups to respond to a blaze. In fact, they attend a fire academy and train for 70 hours.
“To be very blunt, there are members of my department that I would put up against anybody I worked with down in the city,” he said. “They’d hold their own just fine.”
Van Bibber blasted another Marinelli claim — that Julian’s fleet is falling apart.
“It’s all lies. Every bit of it,” he said. “It’s very sad. You put your faith and trust and confidence in a board and a fire chief to do what’s best for the community. And you find out they lied. Ugh. It’s brutal.”
San Diego attorney Craig Sherman is taking another tack.
He has filed lawsuits on behalf of several volunteer firefighters and their association. They seek to halt the dissolution — or at least force a redo board vote.
Sherman argues that a May 8 Julian board vote on the county deal to insert Cal Fire crews into the Julian station should be voided because it wasn’t properly “noticed” — that the public wasn’t made aware that the board would take action. Only hear a presentation.
On May 15 — just before the Board of Supervisors voted 4-0 to forward the dissolution request to LAFCO — Judge Kenneth Medel in San Diego Superior Court rejected Sherman’s “emergency stay” motion to block the deal.
Sherman will try again with Medel. Southcott vs. Julian-Cuyamaca Fire Protection District will be heard at 10:30 a.m. June 8 in Dept. C-66 downtown. Shelver says he expects the outcome will be the same — that the board didn’t violate the state’s open-meetings law.
But looming large is a stickier issue: Who owns the Station 56 land if the Julian district melts away?
At the county supervisors hearing, John “Eagle Spear” Elliott of the Kumeyaay Diegueño Land Conservancy noted that late Julian resident Frances Mosler had deeded 6.4 acres of land to the Native American Land Conservancy — acreage later transferred to the Kumeyaay group.
“By dissolving itself as a district, the property where the fire station was eventually constructed automatically reverts to KDLC for its use consistent with the underlying deed,” Elliott said.
Although Elliott declared KDLC wasn’t taking sides on the Julian dissolution, he said the conservancy hadn’t been approached by the county, LAFCO or the district regarding deed issues.
“I strongly suggest that the parties meet to discuss the county’s future interest, if any, in the property where the former fire district station resides,” he said.
East County Supervisor Dianne Jacob replied: “That definitely will be an issue that the staff will need to look into and work with you on.”
(The county’s Bell said: “We are very early in the LAFCO consolidation process, which is when issues including property ownership are negotiated.” Shelver said the district’s lawyers insist the property would stay in the hands of any agency operating the first station.)
Near the end of the 32-minute hearing, local LAFCO executive Keene Simonds said it would take at least 60 days for his staff to review the Julian application. Then the commission would hold a hearing.
“Every landowner, every registered voter, within the [JCFPD] boundary is going to get a letter from my office saying: ‘At this day and at this time LAFCO is going to consider the potential dissolution and transfer fire protection to County Service Area 135.‘”
If LAFCO approves the plan, Simonds said, the public gets two more chances to weigh in — first at a “protest hearing” within 60 days and second in a possible referendum. If enough district voters submit a form opposing the fire handover, “they will vote on this. Straight up or down.”
But under state law, another option exists. If at least 50 percent of registered JCFPD voters protest the change, it’s killed.
Cal Fire Chief Mecham is aware of this, but deferred to county lawyers and LAFCO for comment.
It was only 10 years ago that the county, following two major wildfires, set out to consolidate nearly two dozen special districts and volunteer fire departments under one regional umbrella — the county fire authority. Supervisor Jacob said the county has spent close to $500 million to improve fire-protection in the backcountry.
Van Bibber sees “great irony” in that origin story.
“The Witch Fire is said to be the catalyst for this grand plan,” he said. “So a wildland fire that the state agency in charge of wildland fires could not handle is now the reason for putting that same agency also in charge of structure fire protection, further insuring that in the next Witch Fire, both wildland and structure fire protection will be poorly handled, and the abandonment of the outlying areas such as Julian will be all but assured.
“We will be expendable and left with no community/local protection at all,” he said via email.
Now only Julian is left to consolidate. Why such a tough nut to crack?
“I don’t want to speculate,” Mecham said. “It is what it is at this point. And I certainly think that the county’s regional offer to spend millions of dollars on fire protection in Julian is the right thing for the community, and I’m not going to comment on the community activism piece.”
But a local charity, the Julian Fire Plugs, tried to explain why Julian residents are hanging tough.
“The community of Julian-Cuyamaca is not a municipality,” says its website. “Rather, it is a large geographical area that comes together as a community through social and volunteer activities.”
It called the JCFPD the most significant bond.
“JCFPD volunteers not only protect this community, they organize a variety of community events,” including high school Fire Explorers, a Community Emergency Response Team, an annual Pancake Breakfast at Lake Cuyamaca and “Halloween Trunk or Treat.”
Van Bibber calls Julian “a piece of Americana,” drawing visitors for its slower pace.
“Most of us consider Julian the Mayberry of San Diego County — people that live here like it for that reason,” he said. “It’s a lifestyle that used to be.”
*An earlier version of this story mistakenly said “love his severance.”