• Facebook
  • Google Plus
  • RSS Feed
  • Twitter

Menu

Skip to content
  • About
  • Staff
  • Contact
  • Support
  • Advertise
  • FAQ
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
Header image

Times of San DiegoLogo

Local News and Opinion for San Diego

Menu

Skip to content
  • All
  • Politics
  • Crime
  • Business
  • Sports
  • Education
  • Arts
  • Military
  • Tech
  • Life
  • Opinion
Search Thousands of San Diego Jobs
  • Mayor Gloria Appoints Farhat Popal As City's Immigrant Affairs Manager
  • Man Pleads Not Guilty to Allegedly Dragging El Cajon Officer With SUV
  • Balboa Park Lights Up to Honor Those Who Have Died from COVID-19
  • Moderna Investigating Allergic Reactions to its COVID-19 Vaccine in San Diego
  • Opinion: In the End, it Was Trump Who Threatened America with Terrorism

Home » Opinion » This Article

Opinion: The High Cost of Failing to Enact Tort Reform in California

Posted by Editor on October 17, 2018 in Opinion | 651 Views
| Comments | Leave a Comment
Share This Article:
Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail
San Diego County Superior Court
The new San Diego County Superior Court in downtown San Diego. Photo by Chris Stone

By Maryann Marino

There’s a sure-fire way to improve the San Diego area economy that would help boost businesses and save jobs for many years to come. It’s a fix that could also save the region and, for that matter, all of California a lot money. A lot … as in billions.

Support Times of San Diego's growth
with a small monthly contribution

Become a supporter

So, what is it? It’s called tort law reform and the goal would be to curb excessive civil tort lawsuits that are inflicting serious economic harm. A new study on the estimated costs of too many tort cases shows that California is suffering economic losses totaling $11.6 billion in annual direct costs.

The Citizens Against Lawsuit Abuse report, titled the Economic Benefits of Tort Reform, calculated that runaway tort litigation inflicts losses of $18.5 billion in economic output each year. That damage, in turn, results in the yearly loss of nearly 200,000 jobs when other effects are considered. The report was conducted by The Perryman Group, a highly respected economic and financial analysis firm based in Texas.

One example to reduce the costs of tort lawsuits would be to reform California’s Safe Drinking Water and Opinion logoToxic Enforcement Act of 1986, commonly known as Proposition 65.  New regulations that took effect Aug. 30 call for new warnings and signage that will only serve as a shakedown lawsuit target, harming small business owners — especially minority small business owners — across the state and here in San Diego.

The act was originally a good-faith attempt to inform consumers and help protect the environment by protecting sources of drinking water from chemicals that cause cancer or reproductive harm. But it has become, instead, an oppressive legal trap that harms consumers and communities.

The harsh new laws require store and business owners to list the full name of one or more of the 900+ chemicals published by the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, the state’s regulatory agency. If OEHHA decides that any product contains “a chemical known to the state to cause cancer or reproductive toxicity,” then manufacturers and distributors, along with retailers, all face potential legal exposure.

So, it’s clear these new laws are going to cause problems. Failure to comply can result in fines of up to a $2,500 a day, and legal settlements that often run $60,000 to $80,000 for beleaguered owners — simply for not properly displaying a $40 warning sign.

Unfortunately, Proposition 65 allows for something called “private rights of action,” which means that unscrupulous individuals can partner with profit-seeking attorneys to act, in effect, as bounty hunters and sue businesses on behalf of the state. These are quintessential shakedown tort lawsuits.

A cursory court search showed that at least 17 Proposition 65 lawsuits have been filed in San Diego Superior Court since January. Of these lawsuits, nine were filed by one plaintiff and five by another, proving that these lawsuits will continue to be a windfall for attorneys.

The problem is that all these negative actions can result in major economic impacts for local neighborhoods, especially those in minority or immigrant communities such as Logan Heights, Southcrest and Lincoln Park. That is because big payments can result in the closure of small businesses and loss of jobs.

The Economic Benefits of Tort Reform Report, which created comparative estimates based the successful tort reform efforts in Ohio, offers other startling findings that are worth noting: the yearly fiscal losses in California are calculated at $961 million in state revenues and $804.7 million for local governments.

Beyond Proposition 65, lawsuit abuse also targets government agencies because they are perceived as having deep pockets. But these deep pockets are your taxpayer dollars. A study commissioned by Citizens Against Lawsuit Abuse showed that in 2011 the City of San Diego spent $17 million fighting frivolous lawsuits while other major cities around the state spent a cumulative $92 million.

The new study goes on to declare that tort reform as used in other states, such as legislation to set limits on punitive and non-economic damages, can result in economic benefits and other positive outcomes.

So, what can we do to fix this? One solution would be to set limits on punitive and economic damages as is being done in other states.  The other is to encourage common sense on the boards overseeing Proposition 65 so they regulate with fairness and take a second look at this onerous law that only seems to financially benefit unscrupulous attorneys.


Maryann Marino is regional director of Citizens Against Lawsuit Abuse, a nonpartisan group of concerned citizens and businesses who are fighting against lawsuit abuse in California. 

Opinion: The High Cost of Failing to Enact Tort Reform in California was last modified: October 18th, 2018 by Editor

>> Subscribe to Times of San Diego’s free daily email newsletter! Click here

Follow Us:
Facebooktwitterrss
Posted in Opinion | Tagged Citizens Against Lawsuit Abuse, lawsuits, Maryann Marino, Proposition 65, The Perryman Group, tort reform
Search Thousands of San Diego Jobs

Get Times of San Diego by Email

Our free newsletter is delivered at 8 a.m. daily.


Most Popular Today

  • San Diego County Expands COVID Vaccinations to Residents Aged 75 and Up San Diego County Expands COVID Vaccinations to Residents Aged 75 and Up 3,480 views
  • Amid Wide Praise for Cindy Marten, San Diego NAACP Hits Biden Pick for Post Amid Wide Praise for Cindy Marten, San Diego NAACP Hits Biden Pick for Post 3,200 views
  • Allergic Reactions to Moderna COVID Vaccine at Petco Park Prompt State Action Allergic Reactions to Moderna COVID Vaccine at Petco Park Prompt State Action 1,270 views
  • Lamont Jackson Chosen Interim SD Unified Superintendent When Marten Leaves Lamont Jackson Chosen Interim SD Unified Superintendent When Marten Leaves 1,230 views
  • Miramar Marines Prepare for 'Winter Fury' Exercise Across Southern California Miramar Marines Prepare for ‘Winter Fury’ Exercise Across Southern California 1,030 views

©®2021 Times of San Diego LLC

Menu

  • About
  • Staff
  • Contact
  • Support
  • Advertise
  • FAQ
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service